Thursday, May 31, 2012

Veterans Disability Benefits and the Decision narrate Officer - When Should You Use the Dro Process?

Office Of Disability Services - Veterans Disability Benefits and the Decision narrate Officer - When Should You Use the Dro Process?
The content is good quality and useful content, That is new is that you just never knew before that I do know is that I have discovered. Before the distinctive. It is now near to enter destination Veterans Disability Benefits and the Decision narrate Officer - When Should You Use the Dro Process?. And the content related to Office Of Disability Services.

Do you know about - Veterans Disability Benefits and the Decision narrate Officer - When Should You Use the Dro Process?

Office Of Disability Services! Again, for I know. Ready to share new things that are useful. You and your friends.

A very tasteless request asked of me by U.S. Veterans who are seeking disability compensation for injuries and disabilities incurred in military service is this: what is the "de novo" narrate the Va offers me when I file my observation of Disagreement, and should I use it?

What I said. It is not outcome that the true about Office Of Disability Services. You look at this article for home elevators a person want to know is Office Of Disability Services.

How is Veterans Disability Benefits and the Decision narrate Officer - When Should You Use the Dro Process?

We had a good read. For the benefit of yourself. Be sure to read to the end. I want you to get good knowledge from Office Of Disability Services.

In all honesty, I cannot think of a scenario where a U.S. Veteran intriguing the Va Regional Office's denial of disability benefits would not ask the Dro review.

To understand why I say this, it is helpful to understand the process of intriguing the Varo (Va Regional Office) denial of a claim for disability compensation to a Us Veteran.

After the veteran's claim is denied by the Va Regional Office (whether denied partially or entirely, the U.S. Veteran must challenge the decision if he or she wants to continue to pursue the benefit.

To begin the process of intriguing the Varo Ratings Decision, the first step is for the Veteran to send the Va Regional Office a written observation of discrepancy (also known as a "Nod"). Once the U.S. Veteran files the "Nod" with the Va Regional Office, that office will typically send the Veteran a form that has some language about development an " petition election. The Va Regional Office will ask that the Veteran choose in the middle of the former petition process or a narrate by what is called a "Decision narrate Officer (which I call the Dro). The Va will give the Veteran 60 days to file the petition determination for with the Varo.

Now, that is the process to get the ball rolling on intriguing the Va Ratings Decision. What is the Dro process, how is it distinct from the Bva, or traditional, appeal, and why do I say it should all the time be utilized by the Veteran?

First, Dros are senior claims examiners who have the authority to grant the Veteran's requested benefits, based on the same evidence that was used in the initial ratings decision. The Dro will narrate the evidence "de novo" (This means, in a nutshell, with fresh eyes and without deference to the initial Va Ratings Decision.)

Second, the Dro is a senior and much more experienced claims representatives with the Va who has probably seen more claims, knows the law better, and whose job is not only to make sure that the Veteran is getting a "non-adversarial" decision, but also to protect the Va from the cost and time of poor decisions from Junior Claims examiners.

Third, the Dro will narrate the case without deference to the Va Rating Decision. In some situations, the Veteran can ask to meet with or talk to the Dro.

Fourth, the Dro process has a good chance of being flourishing and if it is successful, it will be a lot faster than intriguing to the Bva, where the wait for a hearing can be 500-600 days, or more. I was told at a recent Veterans' Cle, without any hard evidence to back up the statistic, that 2% of the initial claim denials are reversed by the Va's Dro process. In the land of the Va, 2% is an incredibly high success ratio (believe it or not).

Fifth, even if the Dro agrees with the initial Ratings Decision, (or makes a decision that is favorable, but not wholly correct) you can still petition to the Bva. So, the Veteran doesn't lose the ability to challenge the Va Ratings Decision, has a 2% chance of having the Varo's decision reversed, often doesn't have to submit any new documentation, and can at times narrate directly with the Dro. What's not to like about the Dro process?

Let me give you a good example of success using the Dro process. In a recent petition I handled for a Vietnam Vet with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (Ptsd), the Va initially denied the Veteran's claim. The Va's position was that there was no evidence that the Veteran had been diagnosed with Ptsd. This conclusion was absurd: the Va had beyond doubt diagnosed the Vet with Ptsd, the diagnosis was in his Claims File And the Va Doctors had already done that this Veteran's Ptsd was a direct effect of his military service.

On profit of the Veteran, we sought narrate by a Dro. Within a consolidate of months, the Veteran was evaluated by a local Va curative Center, and was given an impairment rating for his Ptsd. About 30 days later, the Veteran received payment of past-due money from the Va, and will continue to receive benefits for his now service-connected Ptsd.

Without a Dro, this Veteran would have had to wait at least one or two Years to argue to a Bva HearingS Officer that he was entitled to Ptsd. Even if the Veteran persuaded the Bva Hearing Official, the claim likely would have just been sent back to the Va Regional Office for an impairment estimate and further development of the record. This process could have taken years, without netting a single payment to the Veteran.

While the Dro process does not warrant Veterans that they will win their claim, the Dro process can be a beyond doubt good chance to get the Veteran the benefits they are entitled to - and normally quicker!

The process works for the Va, because they are able to more efficiently sell out their backlog of claims.
The process works for the Bva Hearings Officer, who only has to settle the remaining disputes (such as the effective date of an award, or the allowable impairment percentage, etc.)

In short, I can't think of a reckon not to ask a Dro narrate of the Varo's initial Rating Decision.

I hope you get new knowledge about Office Of Disability Services. Where you may put to use in your evryday life. And most of all, your reaction is Office Of Disability Services.Read more.. Veterans Disability Benefits and the Decision narrate Officer - When Should You Use the Dro Process?. View Related articles related to Office Of Disability Services. I Roll below. I have counseled my friends to assist share the Facebook Twitter Like Tweet. Can you share Veterans Disability Benefits and the Decision narrate Officer - When Should You Use the Dro Process?.


No comments:

Post a Comment